Microsoft enters the Data Warehouse Wars

In partnership with

Dear Reader…

An investigative look at Microsoft's play for enterprise data warehousing dominance against AWS Redshift, Snowflake, BigQuery, and IBM Db2 Warehouse.

The Shifting Sands in the Data Landscape

The enterprise data warehouse (EDW) market is in a state of flux, projected to reach a staggering $8.15 billion by 2032, with the broader data warehouse as a service market set to hit $37.84 billion by 2034. This explosive growth is driven by the insatiable demand for data-driven decision-making and the ongoing migration from legacy systems to cloud-based solutions. In this highly competitive arena, a handful of players have established themselves as dominant forces:

• Amazon (AWS Redshift),

• Snowflake Inc.,

• Google (BigQuery), and

• IBM (Db2 Warehouse).

Yet, a new contender, Microsoft's Azure Cosmos DB, is making aggressive moves. Traditionally known as a globally distributed NoSQL database for operational workloads, recent developments in 2025 have seen Cosmos DB evolve into a "unified AI database," blurring the lines between operational data stores and analytical powerhouses. But can a database primarily designed for transactional processing truly stack up against dedicated enterprise data warehouses? This investigative report delves into how Azure Cosmos DB positions itself against the "Big Four," examining its unique advantages, particularly for organisations already entrenched in the Microsoft ecosystem and specific vertical markets.

The Contenders: A Glimpse at the Big Four

Before dissecting Cosmos DB's challenge, it is crucial to understand the established strengths of its primary rivals in the EDW space.

Snowflake Inc. reigns supreme as the market leader in cloud data warehousing, commanding an impressive 19.87% market share and serving over 11,472 customers. Its success stems from a unique architecture that completely separates compute and storage, allowing for independent scaling and high concurrency, crucial for handling diverse analytical workloads. Snowflake's "near-zero maintenance" philosophy and cross-cloud capabilities have made it a favourite for many enterprises.

Amazon Web Services (AWS) Redshift secures the second position with 14.67% market share and 8,466 customers. As part of the vast AWS ecosystem, Redshift is a petabyte-scale data warehouse service renowned for its performance in analytical workloads, leveraging columnar storage and parallel processing. However, it has faced criticism for concurrency issues and delays in resizing or architectural changes.

Google BigQuery holds a significant 13.14% market share. A fully managed, serverless data warehouse, BigQuery excels at processing massive datasets efficiently, optimized for analytical queries with an SQL-like query language. Its deep integration with Google Cloud's AI/ML services further enhances its appeal for data professionals.

IBM Db2 Warehouse represents the more traditional enterprise stalwart, known for robust analytical capabilities and transactional processing. While perhaps not as ubiquitous in the cloud-native space as its counterparts, Db2 Warehouse offers comprehensive data management solutions and is a strong contender for organisations with existing IBM infrastructure and a need for hybrid cloud deployments.

Azure Cosmos DB: A New Breed of Data Warehouse Contender

Microsoft's strategy with Azure Cosmos DB is not to compete directly as a traditional data warehouse in the vein of Redshift or BigQuery. Instead, its evolution into a "unified AI database" aims to provide an alternative for enterprise data management that handles both operational and analytical workloads, especially within the Microsoft ecosystem.

Blurring the Lines: HTAP and AI Integration

The most compelling aspect of Cosmos DB's play in the EDW space is its Hybrid Transactional/Analytical Processing (HTAP) capabilities, primarily facilitated by Azure Synapse Link. This integration allows for near real-time analytics over operational data without the need for complex, latency-introducing ETL (Extract, Transform, Load) processes. For organisations requiring immediate insights from rapidly changing transactional data, this is a significant advantage. Unlike Redshift, which can experience slow processing when handling multiple queries due to its architecture not separating compute and storage, Azure Synapse Analytics (which integrates with Cosmos DB via Synapse Link) separates these layers, supporting fast, concurrent processing.

Furthermore, Cosmos DB's 2025 pivot to an "AI-native" platform, offering native vector indexing and search, fundamentally changes its positioning. This enables co-location of operational data with AI vectors, eliminating the complexity of managing separate systems for AI applications. This means that for enterprises looking to build AI-driven applications directly on their operational data, Cosmos DB offers a more streamlined approach compared to integrating various AWS database services or relying solely on external analytical platforms for AI workloads.

The Microsoft Ecosystem Advantage

Where Cosmos DB truly shines is within the Microsoft ecosystem. For enterprises deeply invested in Azure, Office 365, Power BI, and other Microsoft services, Cosmos DB offers unparalleled integration. This includes:

• Azure Synapse Link: Seamless HTAP capabilities that integrate Cosmos DB operational data with Synapse Analytics for advanced analytics.

• Power BI: Native connectivity for real-time dashboards and business intelligence.

• Azure Functions: Serverless computing integration for event-driven architectures.

• Microsoft Fabric: Announced in 2025, Fabric aims to be a unified data platform, further solidifying Cosmos DB's role within Microsoft's overarching data strategy.

This deep integration translates into reduced architectural complexity, lower operational overhead, and a more streamlined development experience for teams already proficient in Microsoft technologies. While AWS offers a broad suite of specialised services, integrating them often requires more complex architectural planning. Similarly, while Snowflake can run in an Azure environment, it is not a native Azure product, meaning organisations might miss out on some of the deeper integration benefits available with Synapse.

Industry Vertical Advantages: Where Cosmos DB Excels

Cosmos DB's strengths position it particularly well in specific industry verticals and use cases where global distribution, low-latency access to data, and high scalability are paramount, often for customer-facing or real-time applications. While these are not always traditional "data warehousing" scenarios, the lines are increasingly blurring, and Cosmos DB's HTAP capabilities allow it to perform analytical functions directly on operational data.

1. E-commerce and Retail:
For global retailers like ASOS, Cosmos DB is critical for real-time product recommendations, handling high-velocity, personalised data processing at massive scale. Its ability to deliver single-digit millisecond response times globally and its tunable consistency models are vital for maintaining customer experience across diverse geographies. This contrasts with Redshift, which is an analytical database and less suited for transactional, customer-facing applications requiring real-time updates and low-latency reads.

2. Gaming and Media:
Gaming applications demand elastic scalability to manage user bursts, multi-player profiles, and real-time scoreboards, all while ensuring low-latency access from anywhere in the world. Cosmos DB's automatic scaling and global distribution capabilities make it an ideal fit, allowing it to expand and contract resources dynamically to meet fluctuating demand.

3. IoT and Telecommunications:
The sheer volume, velocity, and variety of data generated by IoT devices require databases that can ingest and aggregate data from diverse sources in real-time. Utilities, telcos, and oil & gas companies leverage Cosmos DB for real-time billing, order management, and handling write-heavy IoT scenarios. Its horizontal scalability is a distinct advantage over more vertically scaling traditional databases like IBM Db2.

4. Healthcare:
In healthcare, applications often require low-latency access to patient data for real-time claims processing, patient profile management, and the modernisation of legacy systems, all while adhering to stringent security and compliance requirements. Cosmos DB's guaranteed uptime (backed by SLAs) and robust security features make it suitable for mission-critical healthcare applications.

5. Manufacturing and Automotive:
Companies in these sectors use Cosmos DB for real-time order processing, supply-chain applications, and connected-vehicle scenarios. The need for real-time visibility into complex supply chains benefits from Cosmos DB's ability to handle global data distribution and provide immediate insights.

The Competitive Landscape: Head-to-Head

While Cosmos DB's strengths are clear, a direct comparison with the "Big Four" reveals different strategic plays:

Azure Cosmos DB vs. AWS Redshift

Redshift is a purpose-built columnar data warehouse for analytics. Cosmos DB, conversely, is a multi-model NoSQL database designed for operational workloads, now with HTAP and AI capabilities. For pure, large-scale, batch analytical processing on structured data, Redshift remains highly competitive. However, for applications requiring real-time operational analytics and integrated AI at the database layer, Cosmos DB, particularly with Azure Synapse Link, offers a more unified solution. Redshift’s shared-nothing MPP architecture can lead to performance issues with concurrent queries, and scaling can take significant time. Cosmos DB, as part of Azure Synapse Analytics, separates compute and storage, supporting faster, concurrent processing.

Azure Cosmos DB vs. Snowflake

This is less of a direct competition and more of a complementary relationship. Snowflake excels as a cloud data warehouse for structured analytics, while Cosmos DB is an operational database for real-time applications. Many enterprises use both: Cosmos DB for transactional data and Snowflake for deep analytical queries over historical data. However, with Cosmos DB's enhanced analytical capabilities via Synapse Link, some simpler analytical needs might be met without migrating data to a separate warehouse. Snowflake's granular scalability and focus on concurrent workloads may offer advantages in specific high-demand analytical environments.

Azure Cosmos DB vs. Google BigQuery

BigQuery is a fully managed, serverless data warehouse specifically designed for analytics. Cosmos DB, while offering some analytical capabilities, is primarily geared towards transactional workloads. BigQuery's strength lies in processing complex, petabyte-scale analytical queries efficiently, and its seamless integration with Google's broader analytics and AI ecosystem is a significant draw. Cosmos DB, however, provides a globally distributed, multi-model database that can handle large amounts of transactional data with guaranteed low latency, something BigQuery is not designed for.

Azure Cosmos DB vs. IBM Db2 Warehouse

IBM Db2 Warehouse is a robust solution for enterprises, offering strong analytical and transactional processing. It often caters to organisations with existing IBM infrastructure or those requiring hybrid cloud deployments. Cosmos DB, being cloud-native and highly scalable horizontally, offers greater agility and global distribution capabilities compared to Db2's more traditional vertical scaling approach. For new cloud-native applications requiring global reach and multi-model flexibility, Cosmos DB often has an edge. However, Db2 Warehouse's advanced analytics capabilities and comprehensive data management solutions remain competitive for specific enterprise needs.

The Conclusion: A Strategic Play, Not a Direct Replacement

Microsoft's Azure Cosmos DB is not aiming to dethrone the traditional enterprise data warehouse leaders by becoming a direct replica. Instead, it is executing a strategic manoeuvre, positioning itself as a powerful unified data platform that addresses a growing enterprise need: the convergence of operational and analytical workloads, particularly those incorporating AI.

For organisations deeply embedded in the Microsoft ecosystem, Cosmos DB offers a compelling value proposition. Its seamless integration with Azure services, coupled with its robust global distribution, multi-model flexibility, and burgeoning AI capabilities, provides a cohesive and efficient solution for handling diverse data workloads. This is especially true for industries like e-commerce, gaming, IoT, and healthcare, where real-time operational data and low-latency access are critical for business operations and customer experience.

While AWS Redshift, Snowflake, and Google BigQuery will likely remain dominant for traditional, large-scale analytical data warehousing, Cosmos DB is carving out its niche by offering a more holistic approach to data management. Its strength lies in its ability to manage transactional data globally, perform real-time analytics on that data via Synapse Link, and natively support AI workloads—all within a single, integrated platform. For data professionals, understanding this nuanced positioning is key. The future of enterprise data management may not be about choosing one platform over another, but rather intelligently combining specialised tools, with Cosmos DB playing an increasingly central role in the operational and AI-driven heart of the enterprise.

That’s a wrap for this week

Happy Engineering Data Pro’s